Women’s Issues:   A Comparison of Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton

2009-2010 American Association of University Women – Positions B is for Bernie C for Clinton

B    100%  C 100%

2009 American Association of University Women – Positions B   100%   C 100%
2007-2008 American Association of University Women – Positions B   100%   C  60%
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America – Positions B     24%   C  10%
2007-2008 Federally Employed Women – Equality in Government Score B     80%   C  50%
2007-2008 National Organization for Women – Positions B    100%  C 100%
2007 American Association of University Women – Positions B    100%  C  66%
2007 Federally Employed Women – Positions B      70%  C  40%
2007 League of Women Voters – Positions B      89%  C  89%
2007 NARAL Pro-Choice America – Positions B     100%  C 100%
2006 NARAL Pro-Choice America – Positions B     100%  C 100%
2005-2006 American Association of University Women – Positions B     100% C 100%
2005-2006 Business and Professional Women USA – Positions B     100% C  83%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America – Positions B      15%  C  11%
2005-2006 Federally Employed Women – Positions B     N/A   C 90%
2005-2006 National Organization for Women – Positions B     95%  C 96%
2005 American Association of University Women – Positions B   100%  C 100%
2005 NARAL Pro-Choice America – Positions B  100%   C 100%
2005 National Organization for Women – Positions B   95%   C 100%
2005 Women’s Action for New Directions (WAND) and WILL – Positions B   N/A    C  66%
2004 NARAL Pro-Choice America – Positions B  100%  C 100%
2003-2004 American Association of University Women – Positions B 100%   C 100%
2003-2004 Business and Professional Women USA – Positions B  69%   C   77%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America – Positions B  20%    C    7%
2003-2004 Federally Employed Women – Positions B  100%  C   90%
2003-2004 Women’s Action for New Directions (WAND) and WILL – Positions B   98%  C   92%
2003 American Association of University Women – Positions B  100%  C  100%
2003 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists – Positions B   0%    C  100%
2003 Business and Professional Women USA – Positions B   71%  C  100%
2003 Concerned Women for America – Positions B   23 % C    0%
2003 NARAL Pro-Choice America – Positions B  100% C  100%
2001-2002 American Association of University Women – Positions B  100% C  100%
2001-2002 Business and Professional Women USA – Positions B  100% C   78%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America – Positions B   24%  C   25%
2001-2002 Women’s Action for New Directions (WAND) and WILL – Positions B   99%  C   77%
2001 American Association of University Women – Positions B  100%  C 100%
2001 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists – Positions B   75%   C 100%
2001 NARAL Pro-Choice America – Positions B  100%  C 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Women  (Sanders Only)   Comparisons above–Clinton not available since 2009

2014 Federally Employed Women – Positions 70%
2013-2014 American Association of University Women – Positions 100%
2013 Concerned Women for America – Positions 0%
2013 Federally Employed Women – Positions 90%
2013 Jewish Women International – Positions 0%
2013 NARAL Pro-Choice America – Positions 100%
2013 Young Women’s Christian Association (YWCA) – Positions 33%
2012 Federally Employed Women – Positions 90%
2012 NARAL Pro-Choice America – Positions 100%
2011-2012 American Association of University Women – Positions 100
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America – Positions 0%
2011 Concerned Women for America – Positions 0%
2011 Federally Employed Women – Positions 100%
2011 NARAL Pro-Choice America – Positions 100%
2010 Federally Employed Women – Positions 80%
2010 NARAL Pro-Choice America – Positions 100%
2009-2010 American Association of University Women – Positions 100%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America – Positions 0%
2009 American Association of University Women – Positions 100%
2009 Federally Employed Women – Positions 90%
2009 NARAL Pro-Choice America – Positions 100%
2009 Women Employed – Positions 100%
2008 NARAL Pro-Choice America – Positions 100%
2007-2008 American Association of University Women – Positions 100%
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America – Positions 24%
2007-2008 Federally Employed Women – Equality in Government Score 80
2007-2008 National Organization for Women – Positions 100%
2007 American Association of University Women – Positions 100
2007 Federally Employed Women – Positions 70%
2007 League of Women Voters – Positions 89%
2007 NARAL Pro-Choice America – Positions 100%
2006 NARAL Pro-Choice America – Positions 100%
2006 United States Women’s Chamber of Commerce – Positions 100%
2006 Women’s Action for New Directions (WAND) and WILL – Positions 100%
2005-2006 American Association of University Women – Positions 100%
2005-2006 Business and Professional Women USA – Positions 100%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America – Positions 15%
2005-2006 National Organization for Women – Positions 95%
2005 American Association of University Women – Positions 100%
2005 NARAL Pro-Choice America – Positions 100%
2005 National Organization for Women – Positions 100%
2004 NARAL Pro-Choice America – Positions 100%
2004 United States Women’s Chamber of Commerce – Positions 50%
2003-2004 American Association of University Women – Positions 100%
2003-2004 Business and Professional Women USA – Positions 69%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America – Positions 20%
2003-2004 Federally Employed Women – Positions 100%
2003-2004 Women’s Action for New Directions (WAND) and WILL – Positions 98%
2003 American Association of University Women – Positions 100%
2003 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists – Positions 0%
2003 Business and Professional Women USA – Positions 71%
2003 Concerned Women for America – Positions 23%
2003 NARAL Pro-Choice America – Positions 100%
2002 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists – Positions 0%
2002 National Organization for Women – Positions 0%
2001-2002 American Association of University Women – Positions 100%
2001-2002 Business and Professional Women USA – Positions 100%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America – Positions 24%
2001-2002 Women’s Action for New Directions (WAND) and WILL – Positions 99%
2001 American Association of University Women – Positions 100%
2001 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists – Positions 75%
2001 NARAL Pro-Choice America – Positions 100%
2000 Concerned Women for America – Positions 23%
2000 NARAL Pro-Choice America – Positions 100%
1999-2000 American Association of University Women – Positions 100%
1999 American Association of University Women – Positions 100%
1999 NARAL Pro-Choice America – Positions 100%
1998 National Organization for Women – Positions 90%
1997-1998 American Association of University Women – Positions 100%
1997-1998 Concerned Women for America – Positions 25%
1997 American Association of University Women – Positions 100%
1997 NARAL Pro-Choice America – Positions 100%
1996 NARAL Pro-Choice America – Positions 100%
1995-1996 American Association of University Women – Positions 100%
1995-1996 Concerned Women for America – Positions 25%
1995 The Woman Activist – Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Finances

Hillary Clinton
On The Ballot: Announced, Democratic for President

Summary

Cycle 2016
Total Raised $115,563,928.67
Total Spent $77,586,281.06
Cash On Hand $37,977,647.61
Debt $978,863.24

Data provided by OpenSecrets.org

Top Contributors

Morgan & Morgan $278,067.00
Emily’s List $239,460.00
Paul, Weiss et al $224,386.00
Corning Inc $214,800.00
DLA Piper $213,875.00
University of California $212,712.00
DISH Network $211,121.00
Morgan Stanley $204,198.00
Sullivan & Cromwell $171,650.00
Time Warner $166,135.00

Top Industries

Lawyers/Law Firms $9,788,113.00
Retired $9,613,364.00
Business Services $3,019,728.00
Securities & Investment $2,944,451.00
Education $2,882,219.00
Real Estate $2,688,186.00
Health Professionals $2,057,343.00
TV/Movies/Music $1,881,060.00
Women’s Issues $1,695,385.00
Civil Servants/Public Officials $1,514,635.00

Top Sectors

Other $15,520,989.00
Lawyers & Lobbyists $10,519,332.00
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate $8,160,978.00
Misc Business $6,787,267.00
Communications/Electronics $5,230,909.00
Health $3,731,724.00
Ideological/Single-Issue $3,119,419.00
Construction $987,781.00
Energy & Natural Resources $623,037.00
Transportation $417,310.00
Agribusiness $405,499.00
Defense $155,340.00
Labor $97,174.00

Bernie Sanders’ Campaign Finances

Bernie Sanders
Office: U.S. Senate (VT) – Jr, Independent
On The Ballot: Announced, Democratic for President

Summary

Cycle 2016
Total Raised $75,023,151.54
Total Spent $46,718,386.00
Cash On Hand $28,304,765.54
Debt $0.00

Data provided by OpenSecrets.org

Top Contributors

Alphabet Inc $98,810.00
University of California $33,598.00
Microsoft Corp $31,148.00
Apple Inc $28,442.00
Amazon.com $18,846.00
US Navy $15,595.00
Kaiser Permanente $15,514.00
University of Illinois $14,780.00
Columbia University $12,293.00
IBM Corp $12,040.00

Top Industries

Retired $1,080,825.00
Education $580,328.00
Lawyers/Law Firms $300,057.00
Health Professionals $296,931.00
Misc Business $286,682.00
Democratic/Liberal $275,490.00
Electronics Mfg & Equip $268,741.00
TV/Movies/Music $218,559.00
Business Services $195,505.00
Internet $183,010.00

Top Sectors

Other $2,059,678.00
Communications/Electronics $853,146.00
Misc Business $736,033.00
Health $527,871.00
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate $359,329.00
Lawyers & Lobbyists $304,285.00
Ideological/Single-Issue $292,156.00
Construction $131,625.00
Agribusiness $93,725.00
Transportation $62,661.00
Energy & Natural Resources $54,103.00
Defense $35,835.00
Labor $22,873.00
Advertisements